Former Director of CIG Motors, Jubril Arogundade, has retained legal representation to challenge fraud allegations levelled against him, signaling his readiness to contest the claims through appropriate legal channels. The development comes amid growing public attention surrounding the accusations, which Arogundade has firmly denied.
In a statement released through his legal team, Arogundade described the allegations as “false, misleading, and damaging,” stressing that they do not reflect his conduct during or after his tenure at CIG Motors. He maintained that his professional career has been guided by transparency, due process, and strict adherence to corporate governance standards.
According to sources familiar with the matter, the allegations relate to transactions allegedly carried out during his time at the automotive company. However, Arogundade’s counsel has argued that the claims are based on misinterpretations of internal processes and incomplete information. His legal team is expected to seek a thorough review of all documents and transactions cited in the case to establish the facts.
Legal analysts note that engaging counsel at an early stage suggests a proactive strategy aimed at protecting Arogundade’s reputation while ensuring that the matter is resolved within the framework of the law. “In cases involving corporate executives, early legal intervention is often crucial to prevent misinformation from shaping public opinion before facts are fully examined,” one Lagos-based legal expert said.
CIG Motors, a major player in Nigeria’s automotive sector, has not issued an extensive public response on the matter, but industry observers say the case underscores the increasing scrutiny faced by corporate leaders amid heightened regulatory and public oversight. The situation also highlights the broader emphasis on accountability and compliance within Nigeria’s corporate environment.
Arogundade’s legal team has reiterated his willingness to cooperate with any lawful investigation, expressing confidence that the process will ultimately clear his name. As proceedings unfold, stakeholders are expected to closely monitor the case, which could have reputational implications for individuals and institutions alike.
For now, the matter remains an allegation, with legal experts emphasizing that due process and the presumption of innocence must be upheld until a competent court reaches a determination.
Leave a Reply